Recent few days have seen protests by a group
of Civil Services aspirants, demanding change in the pattern of Civil Services
examination, particularly scrapping of the Paper-2 (CSAT). Responding to these
demands, the Central Government has urged the UPSC to postpone the Civil
Services (Preliminary) Examination 2014, which is scheduled to be held on 24th
August. In the meanwhile, a committee has been constituted to look into the
concerns of the protestors. [1]
This news has brought fresh uncertainty in the
minds of very many Civil Services aspirants. The notification for this year’s
examination was released on May 31th after a 15-day delay, presumably
to take approval of the new Government. The forms have been filled up now, and
the Prelims are only about 1 month away. The examination process which had begun
after the Government’s approval is now being disrupted by the Government itself.
Moreover, the UPSC is an independent
Constitutional body with a mandate to conduct these examinations. The ‘request’
by Government to postpone the examination looks like undue interference in the functioning
of UPSC, and undermines its Constitutional independence.
However, the genuine concerns of the protestors
need to be addressed to ensure fairness towards aspirants from all backgrounds.
Given that any changes done once are likely to be institutionalized for at
least a few more years, the pattern should be changed only after thorough
analysis and due consultation. With the limited time available this year, this
doesn’t seem possible and any proposed change is likely to be hasty.
The key demand of the protestors is the abolition of CSAT, which, they claim, is biased against the students of Humanities
background because of its focus on analytical skills, reasoning and
comprehension.[2] But wouldn’t removal of CSAT at this stage be unfair to those
students, who have already diverted significant amount of their time and energy
towards preparation of CSAT?
Reasoning and comprehension skills are tested
in the recruitment process of even clerical jobs. The importance of such skills
cannot be ignored in the selection process of the to-be policy makers of the
country. The pattern and syllabus of an examination should be decided on the criteria
of requirements of the future job profile, not on the basis of the candidates’
profile.
Introduction of CSAT was a part of the larger
reform in the outdated recruitment process of Civil Services Officers. Setting
the clock back on any such reform in haste may shut the doors on further
reforms, as objections to any change in status quo will always arise.
The Government should, therefore, effect changes in the pattern only from
the next year onwards and announce those changes well in advance. I hope that the Government will take care
of not only the few hundred protestors, but also thousands of other aspirants
who are going to be affected by any rushed decision in this matter. Hope better
sense prevails!
